<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astrophotography Cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/</link>
	<description>Capture the Nightlife!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Shore</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Shore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=1305#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>Robert,

I&#039;m going to stick with my unmodded 450D for now. I would like to continue to use it for normal photography as well. IR filters are installed by the camera manufacturer to prevent IR light from reaching the imaging sensor. This helps to produce photos that reproduce what our eyes see (we can&#039;t detect IR energy with our eyes- it is outside the visible spectrum). But these filters also make the camera respond poorly to important hydrogen alpha light from emissions nebula like the Veil and the background nebula of the Horsehead. Thus, the photos of emissions nebula with an unmodified DSLR may appear a bit washed out. The unmodified DSLR should work just fine for other types of nebula as well as galaxies and star clusters though. 

There&#039;s two main ways of modifying DSLR&#039;s. One is to remove the stock IR filter completely and another is to remove it and replace it with a filter that blocks IR but passes most of the hydrogen-alpha energy. I have never tried this so I can&#039;t provide guidance on how it is actually done! 

I hope this helps :-)

Ray Shore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to stick with my unmodded 450D for now. I would like to continue to use it for normal photography as well. IR filters are installed by the camera manufacturer to prevent IR light from reaching the imaging sensor. This helps to produce photos that reproduce what our eyes see (we can&#8217;t detect IR energy with our eyes- it is outside the visible spectrum). But these filters also make the camera respond poorly to important hydrogen alpha light from emissions nebula like the Veil and the background nebula of the Horsehead. Thus, the photos of emissions nebula with an unmodified DSLR may appear a bit washed out. The unmodified DSLR should work just fine for other types of nebula as well as galaxies and star clusters though. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s two main ways of modifying DSLR&#8217;s. One is to remove the stock IR filter completely and another is to remove it and replace it with a filter that blocks IR but passes most of the hydrogen-alpha energy. I have never tried this so I can&#8217;t provide guidance on how it is actually done! </p>
<p>I hope this helps <img src='http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ray Shore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spliney</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Spliney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=1305#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>This is a nice overview again. Looking at the long list of ideal targets, I stick to my 450D (unmodded) for now :)
An addition to this tutorial might be shedding some light on the difference between modded and unmodded DSLR&#039;s. I.e. what does it mean to mod the cam? What changes? That sort of thing.

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice overview again. Looking at the long list of ideal targets, I stick to my 450D (unmodded) for now <img src='http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
An addition to this tutorial might be shedding some light on the difference between modded and unmodded DSLR&#8217;s. I.e. what does it mean to mod the cam? What changes? That sort of thing.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "astrophotography"</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "astrophotography"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=1305#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged astrophotography Astrophotography Camera Introduction &#124; AstroPhotog...&#160;saved by 3 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;volcanoofsushi bookmarked on 05/08/09 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged astrophotography Astrophotography Camera Introduction | AstroPhotog&#8230;&nbsp;saved by 3 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;volcanoofsushi bookmarked on 05/08/09 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Shore</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Shore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=1305#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>What digital SLR camera is preferred for astrophotography when price is an issue? I have heard that the Canon 1000D is a very good performing camera for the price. I&#039;m thinking about upgrading from the Canon 300D. Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What digital SLR camera is preferred for astrophotography when price is an issue? I have heard that the Canon 1000D is a very good performing camera for the price. I&#8217;m thinking about upgrading from the Canon 300D. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=1305#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>A webcam is a good way to get started in astrophotography since it is inexpensive and you don&#039;t need quite the telescope mount to get decent results! You just need something with tracking. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A webcam is a good way to get started in astrophotography since it is inexpensive and you don&#8217;t need quite the telescope mount to get decent results! You just need something with tracking. <img src='http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/astrophotography-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=1305#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Great introduction to astrophotography cameras. Looks like I should start with a webcam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great introduction to astrophotography cameras. Looks like I should start with a webcam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
