<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celestron CGEM Review- Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/</link>
	<description>Capture the Nightlife!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Simons</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-2794</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Simons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray,

very informative review.

I have just purchase the CGEM dx 11 inch HD Edge which, if looks are anything to go by, appears to be well worth the cash although since I purchased it last week, I&#039;m suffering from &#039;New&#039; scope curse and not had a clear night sky since. 

Any way I have the same problem as you with the dec index marks being out by 180 degrees if the dove-tail mount is orientated as the picture on the front cover of the instructions ie with the OTA locking bolts facing towards you on the same side as the HC aux ports. Also you can&#039;t point a tripod leg towards north as then the trpiod head lug will not position over the leg. From you review way back in 2009 it seems that Celestron still haven&#039;t addressed this.

What did you do leave as is and continue to work arond the problem?

Regards

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray,</p>
<p>very informative review.</p>
<p>I have just purchase the CGEM dx 11 inch HD Edge which, if looks are anything to go by, appears to be well worth the cash although since I purchased it last week, I&#8217;m suffering from &#8216;New&#8217; scope curse and not had a clear night sky since. </p>
<p>Any way I have the same problem as you with the dec index marks being out by 180 degrees if the dove-tail mount is orientated as the picture on the front cover of the instructions ie with the OTA locking bolts facing towards you on the same side as the HC aux ports. Also you can&#8217;t point a tripod leg towards north as then the trpiod head lug will not position over the leg. From you review way back in 2009 it seems that Celestron still haven&#8217;t addressed this.</p>
<p>What did you do leave as is and continue to work arond the problem?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristóbal Alvarado M.</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristóbal Alvarado M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>Hello,

In the specs of this mount, one can read:

&quot;Latitude Range : 15° to 70°&quot;

This means, I suppose, that I couldn&#039;t use this mount here in Venezuela (Lat. ~10º N).

Any suggestion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>In the specs of this mount, one can read:</p>
<p>&#8220;Latitude Range : 15° to 70°&#8221;</p>
<p>This means, I suppose, that I couldn&#8217;t use this mount here in Venezuela (Lat. ~10º N).</p>
<p>Any suggestion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AstroPhotography Tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>AstroPhotography Tonight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Hello Grant,

Thanks for the feedback. So far my CGEM is working well for me. Last night I did a goto alignment and it put the objects almost perfectly in the center. And then I did a couple of 4 minute expsoures on M31 (using the Orion Autoguider) and it worked perfect. Now if I could just get my computer to work ok. It kept locking up on me so I didn&#039;t get to capture a full set of frames :-(. Hopefully all will go well tonight. Thanks, Ray Shore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Grant,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. So far my CGEM is working well for me. Last night I did a goto alignment and it put the objects almost perfectly in the center. And then I did a couple of 4 minute expsoures on M31 (using the Orion Autoguider) and it worked perfect. Now if I could just get my computer to work ok. It kept locking up on me so I didn&#8217;t get to capture a full set of frames <img src='http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> . Hopefully all will go well tonight. Thanks, Ray Shore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>I had two reservations about this scope before I read your review. I thought that the mount was better suited for just an 8&quot; OTA, instead of the 9.25. Also I was under the impression that the slewing was slow.
I now have thrown both of these reservations out the window. It slews fine, and that CGEM mount is a beauty. 
Nice review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had two reservations about this scope before I read your review. I thought that the mount was better suited for just an 8&#8243; OTA, instead of the 9.25. Also I was under the impression that the slewing was slow.<br />
I now have thrown both of these reservations out the window. It slews fine, and that CGEM mount is a beauty.<br />
Nice review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AstroPhotography Tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>AstroPhotography Tonight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Thanks Becky! I realized what you meant...i have the same problem when I type on my phone! Just too spoiled with spell check! Ray Shore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Becky! I realized what you meant&#8230;i have the same problem when I type on my phone! Just too spoiled with spell check! Ray Shore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>Thanks,Ray. I&quot;ll  buy the extension for the hand control. Sorry for the typos, too (...the &quot;guy from POT&quot;? ... and &quot;marlins&quot; = markings ) Typing on a phone . Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,Ray. I&#8221;ll  buy the extension for the hand control. Sorry for the typos, too (&#8230;the &#8220;guy from POT&#8221;? &#8230; and &#8220;marlins&#8221; = markings ) Typing on a phone . Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AstroPhotography Tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>AstroPhotography Tonight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>Hi Becky,

Thanks for your input. I realized that the index marks were wrong by comparing my CGEM to the manual in the same orientation (OTA and DEC locks on the left side in the photo). I actually think that the picture is showing the original location of the index marks but they decided to move them to the back of the scope so that they are on the same side as the RA index marks. The DEC marks should line up but they don&#039;t. Fortunately you can line up the index mark with the screw hole on the front. Not sure what the guy from OPT meant when he said that it doesn&#039;t matter which way you turn the OTA platform. I assume that you need to have the index marks lined up prior to alignment so the scope can automatically slew close to your first alignment star based on the original position (lined up with the marks). Like you say though, it seems to be ok because our methods are working. 

The short hand controller cable was a surprise too. We have made extension cables available here on AstroPhotography Tonight: http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/hand-controller-extension-cable-cgem. I&#039;ve been using the 7&#039; version for quite some time and it works great. 

Thanks again for your input and let us know how things go with your CGEM! Ray Shore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Becky,</p>
<p>Thanks for your input. I realized that the index marks were wrong by comparing my CGEM to the manual in the same orientation (OTA and DEC locks on the left side in the photo). I actually think that the picture is showing the original location of the index marks but they decided to move them to the back of the scope so that they are on the same side as the RA index marks. The DEC marks should line up but they don&#8217;t. Fortunately you can line up the index mark with the screw hole on the front. Not sure what the guy from OPT meant when he said that it doesn&#8217;t matter which way you turn the OTA platform. I assume that you need to have the index marks lined up prior to alignment so the scope can automatically slew close to your first alignment star based on the original position (lined up with the marks). Like you say though, it seems to be ok because our methods are working. </p>
<p>The short hand controller cable was a surprise too. We have made extension cables available here on AstroPhotography Tonight: <a href="http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/hand-controller-extension-cable-cgem" rel="nofollow">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/hand-controller-extension-cable-cgem</a>. I&#8217;ve been using the 7&#8242; version for quite some time and it works great. </p>
<p>Thanks again for your input and let us know how things go with your CGEM! Ray Shore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray. Thanks for the great review. I have the exact set-up and the same two issues. The cable to the hand-controller is too short, and the markings on the Dec assembly are messed up. If you align the Dec and RA marks as instructed, then the OTA lockdowns and the Dec release are on the left side of the OTA; in the manual they are on the right side. I went in to OPT and asked the sales guy who sold it to me about this. He said to line up the RA and Dec marks as instructed and don&#039;t worry about the picture in the instruction manual. He said the picture is wrong - not the markings. I find it really annoying to have the RA controls on the right and the Dec controls on the left, but it does work. I started using a polar scope for polar alignment and it goes-to and tracks beautifully. What made you so sure right away that the marlins were wrong? Was it because the OTA lockdowns are on the right side in the manual? BTW, the Guy from POT (who is a really good astro-imager and a great guy) said that it actually should not matter which way you turn the OTA platform.  That doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense, but I guess it is true since both of our assembly methods seem to be working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray. Thanks for the great review. I have the exact set-up and the same two issues. The cable to the hand-controller is too short, and the markings on the Dec assembly are messed up. If you align the Dec and RA marks as instructed, then the OTA lockdowns and the Dec release are on the left side of the OTA; in the manual they are on the right side. I went in to OPT and asked the sales guy who sold it to me about this. He said to line up the RA and Dec marks as instructed and don&#8217;t worry about the picture in the instruction manual. He said the picture is wrong &#8211; not the markings. I find it really annoying to have the RA controls on the right and the Dec controls on the left, but it does work. I started using a polar scope for polar alignment and it goes-to and tracks beautifully. What made you so sure right away that the marlins were wrong? Was it because the OTA lockdowns are on the right side in the manual? BTW, the Guy from POT (who is a really good astro-imager and a great guy) said that it actually should not matter which way you turn the OTA platform.  That doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense, but I guess it is true since both of our assembly methods seem to be working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Shore</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Shore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>Hello John,

No problem...I thought you might have meant another mount. Yeah, the CGE did get discontinued since it was replaced by the CGE Pro. I probably would have gotten a CGE when the prices came down if it didn&#039;t have that early limit for the meridian flip. 

Thanks,
Ray Shore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>No problem&#8230;I thought you might have meant another mount. Yeah, the CGE did get discontinued since it was replaced by the CGE Pro. I probably would have gotten a CGE when the prices came down if it didn&#8217;t have that early limit for the meridian flip. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ray Shore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/celestron-cgem-review-part1/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astrophotography-tonight.com/?p=2476#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>Ray Hi there,
Ray its my fault is should be CGE Computerized once again thank you and tons wish you clear skies.
John&gt; South Africa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray Hi there,<br />
Ray its my fault is should be CGE Computerized once again thank you and tons wish you clear skies.<br />
John&gt; South Africa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

